ArXiv, the open repository for preprint research, is taking a firm stance against the careless use of large language models (LLMs) in scientific papers. This move comes as a response to the growing number of low-quality, AI-generated papers and the potential for fabricated citations. The platform's computer science section chair, Thomas Dietterich, has announced a new policy that will hold authors accountable for the content they submit. If a submission contains clear evidence that the authors did not verify the results of LLM generation, such as hallucinated references or comments from the LLM, the authors will face a 1-year ban from ArXiv. This ban will be followed by a requirement for subsequent submissions to be accepted by a reputable peer-reviewed venue. This policy is not an outright prohibition on using LLMs but emphasizes the need for authors to take full responsibility for the content, regardless of its generation method. Dietterich's statement highlights the importance of human oversight and accountability in the use of AI tools. The rise of fabricated citations in biomedical research, often attributed to LLMs, further underscores the need for this policy. As AI continues to play a significant role in research, ArXiv's decision to crack down on AI slop is a necessary step to maintain the integrity of scientific publications. This development raises questions about the future of AI in research and the potential for further regulation in the field.
